All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonid Mamchenkov <f.l.linux-admin@news.francoudi.com>
To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Red Hat Network ...
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:19:54 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030305091954.GB3555@francoudi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20030304063004.00b02ae8@mustang>

Dear Scott Taylor,

Once you wrote about "RE: Red Hat Network ...":
ST> >>     and yet another reason NOT to depend on RH ...
ST> 
ST> Well put Terry, depend only on yourself.  

Agreed. :)

ST> Still, there is nothing wrong with RH, other than they are looking 
ST> more and more like M$ every day.  Oh well, someone has to make money
ST> off this thing, and RH has put a lot into it, they deserve to get 
ST> some back, as do others that back and support Linux.

While I can understand the feeling some people have about RedHat these
days, I certainly disagree.  RedHat is a profit-oriented company and is
very well expected to charge for something.  RedHat's product is
service.  RedHat Network is one of them.  You want a service, you pay
the money.  As simple as that.  If you just need the updates, then you
can easily get them from ftp://updates.redhat.com using either wget or
any of the numerious scripts from http://freshmeat.net .  Updates are
_FREE_, and you have the _SOURCE_ for all of them.  That's something M$
has a lot of troubles with. ;)

ST> So, now for all the time RHN saves me in searching for downloads to keep my 
ST> one out ten servers up-to-date, I'm not going to whine about filling out a 
ST> simple little survey.  I might fudge anything personal and give them my 
ST> freemail.com address that I never check, but what can it hurt to give them 
ST> 2-3 minutes, even 10 minutes, of your time every 60 days.  Compared to the 
ST> time I'm saving right now, as I respond to this silliness and RH updates my 
ST> server for me, and the time it took to grab that next coffee and fill out 
ST> some survey, it is nothing.

Actually, all comes down to money anyway.  RedHat offers a "Basic
subscription" which is only 60$ per year (
https://rhn.redhat.com/info/purchase_info.pxt ).  Now, count 10 minutes
every 60 days in the year, you get roughly 1 hour.  If you make less
then 60$ an hour, you are better of with the survey, otherwise just buy
the damn thing. :)

ST> <snippet from previous link>
ST> The carrots? There are implied sticks to most of these. Paid
ST> subscribers will get instant access to ISOs as soon as they're out,
ST> which means "no more long downloads from ftp sites, driving to the
ST> store, or waiting for your friends to finish with their copy."
ST> </snippet>
ST> That doesn't sound so bad to me.  If I was running 20 RH servers, this 
ST> would be a blessing.  Back in the days of SCO Open Server I was paying a 
ST> large amount of money for their yearly support and updates products, not to 
ST> mention their per-user license.  Now I do more work, serve more users on 

-- 
Best regards,
  Leonid Mamtchenkov, RHCE
  System Administrator
  Francoudi & Stephanou Ltd.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-05  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <C65F89D1AC0BB54B865127151A24DA780E49087F@nbexchm2.aliant.i cn>
2003-03-04 15:21 ` Red Hat Network Scott Taylor
2003-03-04 17:42   ` Leonid Mamchenkov
2003-03-05  9:19   ` Leonid Mamchenkov [this message]
     [not found] <C65F89D1AC0BB54B865127151A24DA780E49089C@nbexchm2.aliant.i cn>
2003-03-04 16:12 ` Scott Taylor
     [not found] <C65F89D1AC0BB54B865127151A24DA780E490896@nbexchm2.aliant.i cn>
2003-03-04 15:46 ` Scott Taylor
2003-03-04 15:41 Shaw, Marco
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-04 12:11 Shaw, Marco
2003-03-04 13:04 ` terry white
2003-03-04 11:19 terry white

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030305091954.GB3555@francoudi.com \
    --to=f.l.linux-admin@news.francoudi.com \
    --cc=leonid@francoudi.com \
    --cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.