From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Herman Oosthuysen <Herman@WirelessNetworksInc.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows temperature anomaly
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:38:44 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200303061038.44872.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E66842F.9020000@WirelessNetworksInc.com>
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:11 am, Herman Oosthuysen wrote:
> Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> > We've been seeing a curious phenomenon on some PIII/ServerWorks CNB30-LE
> > systems.
> >
> > The systems fail at relatively low temperatures. While the failures are
> > So, the puzzle: what might account for temperature sensitivity, of all
> > things, under Linux 2.4.9-31 (RH 7.2), but not Win2K?
>
> Linux is more 'busy' than windoze and I have heard of boxes frying when
> running Linux. The solution is to find a better motherboard
> manufacturer...
That doesn't make sense. His post said the temperature was 20 degrees lower
when it failed.
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-05 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1045784829.3821.10.camel@laptop-linux.cunninghams>
[not found] ` <20030223223757.GA120@elf.ucw.cz>
[not found] ` <1046136752.1784.15.camel@laptop-linux.cunninghams>
[not found] ` <20030227132024.GB27084@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
2003-02-27 18:42 ` SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedirs Nigel Cunningham
2003-03-01 4:22 ` SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Nigel Cunningham
2003-03-02 23:55 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-03-03 2:06 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-03-03 2:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-03-03 12:30 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-04 20:36 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-03-05 20:50 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-05 21:52 ` Linux vs Windows temperature anomaly Jonathan Lundell
2003-03-05 23:11 ` Herman Oosthuysen
2003-03-05 23:38 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-03-05 23:50 ` Russell King
2003-03-06 0:29 ` Ed Sweetman
2003-03-06 0:47 ` Trever L. Adams
2003-03-06 9:45 ` Russell King
2003-03-06 1:58 ` Jonathan Lundell
2003-03-06 7:18 ` Corvus Corax
2003-03-06 7:57 ` Ed Sweetman
2003-03-06 8:18 ` Corvus Corax
2003-03-06 8:58 ` Ed Sweetman
2003-03-06 15:41 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-03-06 14:27 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-03-06 2:57 ` David Rees
2003-03-06 6:12 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-06 16:07 ` Jonathan Lundell
2003-03-07 0:40 ` Horst von Brand
2003-03-05 18:02 ` SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Pavel Machek
2003-03-07 17:14 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-03-07 20:27 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-09 19:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-03-09 20:12 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-10 16:49 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-03-10 19:23 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-10 19:05 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-03-10 22:17 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-03-10 23:20 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-07 20:36 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-10 16:51 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-03-10 19:12 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-10 18:59 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-03-07 20:41 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-06 17:29 Linux vs Windows temperature anomaly Ed Vance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200303061038.44872.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=Herman@WirelessNetworksInc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.