From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.64-mm1 with contest
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:24:55 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200303070724.55565.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
contest results:
no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 4 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.63-mm2 3 80 92.5 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.64 3 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.64-mm1 5 81 91.4 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 4 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.63-mm2 3 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.94
2.5.64 3 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.64-mm1 5 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.93
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 4 92 81.5 28.2 15.2 1.16
2.5.63-mm2 3 92 80.4 29.3 16.3 1.15
2.5.64 3 92 81.5 30.0 16.3 1.16
2.5.64-mm1 5 94 78.7 30.2 18.1 1.16
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 3 99 79.8 1.0 4.0 1.25
2.5.63-mm2 3 112 70.5 1.0 6.2 1.40
2.5.64 3 100 79.0 0.0 0.0 1.27
2.5.64-mm1 5 114 69.3 0.8 4.4 1.41
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 3 102 74.5 1.0 3.9 1.29
2.5.63-mm2 3 108 70.4 1.0 4.6 1.35
2.5.64 3 103 73.8 1.0 3.9 1.30
2.5.64-mm1 5 112 67.9 1.0 4.5 1.38
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 5 217 35.0 56.7 15.1 2.75
2.5.63-mm2 3 99 75.8 15.1 7.1 1.24
2.5.64 3 229 33.2 58.8 14.8 2.90
2.5.64-mm1 5 97 77.3 13.6 6.2 1.20
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 4 95 78.9 15.3 8.3 1.20
2.5.63-mm2 3 92 80.4 13.2 6.5 1.15
2.5.64 3 100 75.0 18.4 9.0 1.27
2.5.64-mm1 5 93 80.6 13.7 7.5 1.15
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 3 106 74.5 5.7 4.7 1.34
2.5.63-mm2 3 121 64.5 8.4 5.8 1.51
2.5.64 3 103 76.7 6.2 4.9 1.30
2.5.64-mm1 5 115 68.7 8.2 6.1 1.42
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 3 96 79.2 0.0 6.2 1.22
2.5.63-mm2 3 99 76.8 0.0 6.1 1.24
2.5.64 3 96 79.2 0.0 6.2 1.22
2.5.64-mm1 5 100 76.0 0.0 7.0 1.23
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 3 104 75.0 57.7 1.9 1.32
2.5.63-mm2 3 132 59.1 90.3 2.3 1.65
2.5.64 3 105 74.3 58.3 1.9 1.33
2.5.64-mm1 5 111 70.3 63.2 1.8 1.37
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 4 194 39.2 2.0 38.7 2.46
2.5.63-mm2 3 236 32.2 2.7 43.2 2.95
2.5.64 3 222 34.2 2.3 38.7 2.81
2.5.64-mm1 5 231 32.9 2.6 42.0 2.85
Compared with 2.5.63-mm2 hardly any difference. Slightly better read load,
slightly longer tar loads; the climbing mem_load problem has gone away...?
Con
reply other threads:[~2003-03-06 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200303070724.55565.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.