From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262079AbTCHQaj>; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:30:39 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262078AbTCHQaj>; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:30:39 -0500
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:23505 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S262076AbTCHQai>;
	Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:30:38 -0500
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 08:22:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20030308.082224.130739242.davem@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com
Cc: zippel@linux-m68k.org, david.lang@digitalinsight.com, hpa@zytor.com,
       rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303080826300.2954-100000@home.transmeta.com>
References: <20030308.080317.27972826.davem@redhat.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0303080826300.2954-100000@home.transmeta.com>
X-FalunGong: Information control.
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

   From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
   Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:35:24 -0800 (PST)

   The thing is, this discussion has _not_ been exactly neutral. You may have 
   said "could" or "might" or whatever, but clearly people are trying to 
   pressure hpa into going to GPL. It's the whole tone of the thread.
   
   Or would you disagree with that?
   
The tone of parts of this thread, sure.

Did my intentions match this?  Absolutely not.

I couldn't justify my use of bitkeeper if I didn't believe in
personal choice about licenses.