From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
To: Szakacsits Szabolcs <szaka@sienet.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63))
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:17:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030312001739.B30855@twiddle.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0303120848040.17121-100000@divine.city.tvnet.hu>; from szaka@sienet.hu on Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:02:08AM +0100
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:02:08AM +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> gcc team must have, haven't it? Do you know?
I have one test case. It was never turned into anything
that you could run.
> I thought about it, I'm just afraid too much kernel wouldn't build.
Then it won't build. Use a different compiler.
> This bug is in most 2.95, 2.96 and according to Alan in 3.0 and early
> 3.1) and people would just start "working around" it by commenting out
> the check for getting something to work quickly then forgetting about
> the issue completely.
The bug report I can find,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg00746.html
was fixed before gcc 3.0.0 was released. So if this is
a different bug...
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-12 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-02 1:38 ntfs OOPS (2.5.63) Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-04 14:51 ` [Linux-NTFS-Dev] " Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-05 19:09 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2003-03-06 6:19 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-06 6:28 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-06 6:42 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-06 12:32 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2003-03-06 14:34 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-06 14:55 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2003-03-06 19:39 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-06 19:41 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-06 20:15 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-06 20:36 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-06 21:46 ` Oops counter (was Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-07 7:50 ` [Linux-NTFS-Dev] ntfs OOPS (2.5.63) Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-07 7:52 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-07 17:17 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-07 17:56 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-07 18:08 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-08 13:24 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-08 15:47 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-10 4:16 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-10 7:22 ` 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-11 17:01 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-11 16:29 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 1:09 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-13 18:02 ` Zach Brown
2003-03-12 0:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12 6:07 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 7:52 ` Richard Henderson
2003-03-12 8:02 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 8:17 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2003-03-12 8:45 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 9:17 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 15:28 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 15:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12 23:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-03-12 10:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-03-12 15:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12 15:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-03-12 15:35 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 15:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-03-12 15:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12 16:38 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-12 16:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-12 18:25 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12 21:54 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12 22:28 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-13 1:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-14 8:04 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-14 10:00 ` Helge Hafting
2003-03-14 11:02 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-13 21:07 ` Horst von Brand
2003-03-13 23:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-14 1:08 ` Jonathan Lundell
2003-03-14 4:29 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-14 6:26 ` Jonathan Lundell
2003-03-15 18:24 ` Horst von Brand
2003-03-15 19:47 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-12 21:13 ` Horst von Brand
2003-03-12 22:03 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-13 21:04 ` Horst von Brand
2003-03-14 7:14 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-03-14 12:16 ` Backward disassembling (was: Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp) Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-14 16:53 ` Jonathan Lundell
2003-03-15 18:34 ` 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Horst von Brand
2003-03-17 6:56 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-03-17 21:43 ` Horst von Brand
2003-03-18 3:28 ` Keith Owens
2003-03-18 7:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-03-20 10:48 ` Keith Owens
2003-03-20 11:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-03-18 19:44 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-18 6:05 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-03-18 6:35 ` John Alvord
2003-03-14 18:01 ` Olaf Titz
2003-03-14 18:56 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-03-12 23:32 ` [PATCH] OOPS counters Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-06 12:27 ` [Linux-NTFS-Dev] ntfs OOPS (2.5.63) Anton Altaparmakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030312001739.B30855@twiddle.net \
--to=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=szaka@sienet.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.