From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: [PATCH] various allocator optimizations Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:15:31 +0300 Message-ID: <20030312101531.C8452@namesys.com> References: <1047400482.8215.312.camel@tiny.suse.com> <20030311194205.A4493@namesys.com> <1047403968.8219.337.camel@tiny.suse.com> <3E6E584D.4080809@namesys.com> <1047421551.8219.448.camel@tiny.suse.com> <6241720265.20030311233919@tnonline.net> <3E6E6928.80203@namesys.com> <9744137687.20030312001937@tnonline.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9744137687.20030312001937@tnonline.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Anders Widman Cc: Hans Reiser , Chris Mason , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello! On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:19:37AM +0100, Anders Widman wrote: > 2) The disk driver has no knowledge of the above filesystem and > its files. In case of several concurrent writes of lots smaller > files the fs could allow for caching them and write them out in > sequence instead of parallel. Space might be more efficiently used, Hm, I thought that's what we have page cache for ;) Bye, Oleg