From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] various allocator optimizations
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:11:29 +0300
Message-ID: <20030313091129.B3026@namesys.com>
References: <1047421551.8219.448.camel@tiny.suse.com> <3E6E674E.4040305@namesys.com> <1047433739.8215.487.camel@tiny.suse.com> <20030312101222.A8452@namesys.com> <1047475876.8215.507.camel@tiny.suse.com> <3E6F3D80.80306@namesys.com> <20030312170522.A2128@namesys.com> <3E6F3F55.2030503@namesys.com> <20030312171718.C2128@namesys.com> <3E6F8909.7080805@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-13238-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E6F8909.7080805@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Hello!

On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:22:49PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:

> >True for repacker. I do not see for allocate on flush will help.
> >I see how relocate on flush may help ;)
> If you don't allocate it until flush, you don't need to reallocate at 
> flush time...;-)

But what if we have some free space in already existing node, and new file information
perfectly fits in there?

Bye,
    Oleg