From: Petro <petro@auctionwatch.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Problems and questions with LVM on a large raid system.
Date: Thu Mar 13 18:25:02 2003 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030314002507.GE22003@auctionwatch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E704492.DF386E61@silicide.dk>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:42:58AM +0100, Jon Bendtsen wrote:
> Petro wrote:
> [cut]
> > The production data we gathered showed the opposite--at least for the
> > 3ware cards in our environment (we had about 5-8% more overhead
> > running the 3ware cards RAID0 than we did running either raw disk
> > (cheap IDE cards) or having the 3ware card pretend to be a jbod.
> you mean the cpu was more used ?
No, meaning we got better overall performance out of Mysql. Fewer
running threads, threads connected and disconnected better etc.
> > Unfortunately I'll probably not get a chance to redo these.
> a shame, because if you dont need snapshots, LVM is a overhead.
It may come to that.
> > > > Since I need the disk write rate of all 6 drives, I'm *REALLY* hoping
> > > > that it's interleaved.
> > > sorry... it is not interleaved.
> > > JonB
> > > ps: how big a partition do you need stripping for? Do you need the
> > > advanced LVM stuff, like resize, snapshot...
> > I need slightly over 1T of formatted disk space on each system.
> > Which means i really need to find a way to send an <alt-3> through
> > an ssh session to a telnet window.
> may i suggest
> http://www.realweasel.com/intro.html
> It's a pci GFX<->serial card.
> I dont have one, but i want 3. If you buy one... do tell us how it
> works.
That won't solve the problem.
See, my servers are 55 miles down the road. I ssh to a machine that
connects to a private network, on which are a bunch of portmasters
and APCs. I then telnet to the Portmaster ports, which hook to cua0.
It looks basically like I call he "smart hands" at the Colo and talk
them through redoing the RAID volumes.
--
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray,
Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right
answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion
of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-13 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-12 13:53 [linux-lvm] Problems and questions with LVM on a large raid system Petro
2003-03-12 16:14 ` jon+lvm
2003-03-12 16:24 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-03-12 16:50 ` jon+lvm
2003-03-12 17:00 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-03-12 17:17 ` jon+lvm
2003-03-12 17:25 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-03-12 17:46 ` Petro
2003-03-13 2:44 ` Jon Bendtsen
2003-03-13 18:25 ` Petro [this message]
2003-03-14 2:32 ` Adrian Phillips
2003-03-15 13:50 ` Steven Lembark
2003-03-15 16:37 ` jon+lvm
2003-03-18 3:14 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-12 21:03 Barry, Christopher
2003-03-13 2:45 ` Jon Bendtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030314002507.GE22003@auctionwatch.com \
--to=petro@auctionwatch.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.