From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: badblocks blocksize setting
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 11:16:00 +0300
Message-ID: <20030315111600.A24872@namesys.com>
References: <006b01c2ea87$20046a40$55c7a8c0@mariusw2k>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-13272-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <006b01c2ea87$20046a40$55c7a8c0@mariusw2k>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Marius Reiner <news.mr@gmx.net>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Hello!

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:09:19AM +0100, Marius Reiner wrote:

> not really a reiserfs issue:
> When following the FAQ everything is fine, I set blocksize zu 4096 as
> debugreiserfs told me, and don't get any bad blocks.

Good.

> Nevertheless I'm a bit concerned about the ones, badblocks reports, when
> being invoked without the -b option. How does this happen?

Can you please show the command line and the resulting output with badblocks?
Also what is in dmesg output after such a run?

> Or should I just ignore them?

There is not enough info yet.
Can you please tell us whole story?

Bye,
    Oleg