From: Hiro Yoshioka <hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com>
To: rddunlap@osdl.org
Cc: jamagallon@able.es, mikpe@user.it.uu.se,
perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com
Subject: Re: [Perfctr-devel] Re: perfctr-2.5.0 released
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:47:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030317014736O.hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33207.4.64.238.61.1047616615.squirrel@www.osdl.org>
Hi,
We have made a memory profiling tool based on the perfctr 2.5.0.
http://downloads.sourceforge.jp/hardmeter/2646/hardmeter-030314.tar.gz
The tool (hardmeter) is
1) patch to perfctr 2.5.0
2) ebs (PEBS (Precise Event Based Sampling) memory profiling tool)
3) API
Thanks,
Hiro
> >
> > On 03.11, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> >> Version 2.5.0 of perfctr, the Linux/x86 performance
> >> monitoring counters driver, is now available at the usual
> >> place: http://www.csd.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/perfctr/
> >>
> >
> > Perhaps this has been asked for a million times, but I'm new to
> > perfctrs...
> > Is there any tool available to profile a program based on this ?
> > I have seen perfex, but that gives total counts. I would like something like
> > gprof... We are now optimizing some software and I would like to make my
> > colleagues leave Windows (they use Intel's VTune) and go to Linux.
> > Or at least compare the same kind of things between VTune on win and
> > 'something' in Linux that also uses the counters. They don't seem to trust
> > gprof. And, looking at the results, I'm beginning to untrust VTune...
>
> I hope that Mikael knows of some native Linux tools for this.
> However, Intel did announce Vtune for Linux recently (might still be
> in beta test), and there was a SuSE patch for it posted at
> kernelnewbies.org also. See:
>
> http://www.linuxhardware.org/comments.pl?sid=364&cid=530
> http://www.linuxhardware.org/articles/03/01/17/1633229.shtml
> http://kernelnewbies.org/kernels/SuSE81/SOURCES/patches.i386/50_vtune-ia32
> (warning: this is for 2.4.19)
>
> or google for "+vtune +linux".
>
> ~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-16 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-11 0:02 perfctr-2.5.0 released Mikael Pettersson
2003-03-14 1:25 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-03-14 4:36 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-16 16:47 ` Hiro Yoshioka [this message]
2003-03-14 9:10 ` [Perfctr-devel] " Nils Smeds
2003-03-14 15:01 ` William Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030317014736O.hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com \
--to=hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@user.it.uu.se \
--cc=perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.