From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:14:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:14:00 -0500 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:2826 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:14:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:12:45 -0800 From: Greg KH To: David Brownell Cc: Jeff Garzik , usb-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ivan Kokshaysky Subject: Re: [patch 2.5.65] ehci-hcd, don't use PCI MWI Message-ID: <20030319181245.GC15212@kroah.com> References: <3E788B06.4090302@pacbell.net> <20030319153421.GA26181@gtf.org> <3E78927F.4060600@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E78927F.4060600@pacbell.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 07:53:35AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > I'd be happy with that, except on the 2.4 trees where we haven't > seen such a patch yet. (So Greg -- please hold off on this > for 2.5 unless/until it becomes clear Ivan's patch won't happen.) I'll hold off for both 2.5 and 2.4, as Ivan's patch should go into both kernels. thanks, greg k-h