From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Kai Germaschewski <kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>, maxk@qualcomm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Hoogerhuis <alexh@ihatent.com>
Subject: Re: Sleeping in illegal context with 2.5.65-mm2
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 21:05:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030320050537.GA19436@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303192300410.11075-100000@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 11:03:51PM -0600, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > > Debug: sleeping function called from illegal context at mm/slab.c:1723
> > > Call Trace:
> > > [<c0119d92>] __might_sleep+0x5f/0x65
> > > [<c013a097>] kmalloc+0x88/0x8f
> > > [<c0238111>] usb_alloc_urb+0x21/0x51
> > > [<f09180bc>] hci_usb_enable_intr+0x20/0xf8 [hci_usb]
> >
> > The call to usb_alloc_urb() here is being done with the GFP_ATOMIC flag,
> > which is correct. Do we need to fix up the warning message to prevent
> > false positives like this from happening?
>
> Not in my tree: (drivers/bluetooth/hci_sb.c)
>
> if (!(urb = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_KERNEL)))
> return -ENOMEM;
Doh, nevermind, I was looking at the wrong function, sorry.
> And the function is called in a write_lock_irqsave(), so the complaint is
> justified.
Max, you should probably fix this up.
> (Also, I think __might_sleep() deliberately doesn't get triggered for
> GFP_ATOMIC already, as you suggested).
Yeah, in digging deeper, it's a smart check, sorry.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-20 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-20 2:58 Sleeping in illegal context with 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-20 4:39 ` Greg KH
2003-03-20 5:03 ` Kai Germaschewski
2003-03-20 5:05 ` Greg KH [this message]
2003-03-24 21:44 ` Max Krasnyansky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030320050537.GA19436@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=alexh@ihatent.com \
--cc=kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.