From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from systemhalted (CPE00045aedab24-CM.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.112.227.68]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C28482C for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 07:14:17 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:14:08 -0500 From: Carlos O'Donell To: Ryan Bradetich Cc: Matthew Wilcox , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] /lib/ld.so.1 (glibc) issues on 2.5 kernel?? Message-ID: <20030320141408.GB25896@systemhalted> References: <1047917954.14507.15.camel@beavis.ybsoft.com> <20030317163206.GE28607@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <1047919859.14507.21.camel@beavis.ybsoft.com> <1047972053.19011.14.camel@beavis.ybsoft.com> <1048148150.19036.11.camel@beavis.ybsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1048148150.19036.11.camel@beavis.ybsoft.com> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Ryan, > user_entry: 41001fb4 > ENTRY_POINT: 41027082 Intereting... > Since they are different, the if statement fails... My belief > is they should be the same when /lib/ld.so.1 is called because > of the following comment inside this if statement: I wouldn't trust code comments. > to me there looks like two things that could be wrong: > > 1. The exec->e_entry needs to be fixed in the kernel, so it matches > the _start of the library. > > 2. The ENTRY_POINT needs to be changed in glibc for parisc-linux. > > I am planning to pursue option 1 unless someone thinks option 2 is the > correct option to pursue. Would you be willing to ask this question on libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com? If not, I could push the question out there and see what the official solution should be and why. I'm interested to know why this broke? :) c.