All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rwhron@earthlink.net
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: benchmark anobjrmap with 2.5.65-mm2
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 12:08:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030322170855.GA25553@rushmore> (raw)

Anonymous objrmap patches appear to several workloads
a little for uniprocessor K6/2 475 mhz with 2 ide disks 
and 384 MB ram.

Build times for autoconf (a fork test), kernel, and perl.

                           autoconf    kernel         perl
2.5.65                     3845          1641         1348 seconds
2.5.65-mm1                 3898          1646         1326
2.5.65-mm2                 3895          1582         1312
2.5.65-mm2-anobjrmap       3824          1614         1284

autoconf and perl builds were faster with anon obj rmap.
kernel build was not.  kernel build uses pipe more than
autoconf/perl build.  Could be the fact there was only
one sample too.

Lmbench pipe latency and bandwidth don't provide an obvious
explanation why kernel build was slower with anobjrmap.

*Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better

kernel                           Pipe   
2.5.65                           15.36 ms 
2.5.65-mm1                       15.80  
2.5.65-mm2                       15.21  
2.5.65-mm2-anobjrmap             14.11  

*Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better

kernel                           Pipe  
2.5.65                            64.5 MB/second
2.5.65-mm1                        63.3 
2.5.65-mm2                        65.9 
2.5.65-mm2-anobjrmap              65.1 

I'm running 2.5.65-mm3 now and will watch how kernel build
goes there.

AIM7 workloads were generally a hair faster with anobjrmap.

More benchmarks on recent kernels at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/latest.html

Irman process load starvation still appears in 2.5.65 and 
2.5.65-mm[12].

-- 
Randy Hron
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html


                 reply	other threads:[~2003-03-22 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030322170855.GA25553@rushmore \
    --to=rwhron@earthlink.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.