From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Schwebel Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:59:22 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [RFD] Consistent debugging output structure In-Reply-To: <20030324085228.B50C4C58BA@atlas.denx.de> References: <20030324082308.GA28544@pengutronix.de> <20030324085228.B50C4C58BA@atlas.denx.de> Message-ID: <20030324085922.GD28544@pengutronix.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:52:23AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > I have answered this question before. I see no need for such a patch > in the common code. You can easily implement it using the existing > debug() macro if you feel you need it in your own code. > > I will reject such a patch if it globally effects all boards and all > common code. How could it affect other implementations if, additionally to the existing debug() function, debug2() and debug3() are added? Sorry, but I don't understand your arguments. I've never said that I wanted to change the whole code at once. Robert -- Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry Braunschweiger Str. 79, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 | Fax: +49-5121-28619-4