All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 21:08:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030328050839.GP1350@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030115105802.GQ940@holomorphy.com>

On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:58:02AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Minor extrapolation: aside from potential explosions in very unusual
> corner cases, with these hacks/workarounds 64GB NUMA-Q should boot and
> run (slowly) with an approximate LowTotal of 173296 kB. The main obstacle
> is our setup here would require an additional NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG
> patch, and there isn't much local interest in even seeing whether or how
> poorly it would run without working patches (e.g. hugh's MMUPAGE_SIZE that
> I'm fwd. porting) to do something about runaway mem_map lowmem consumption.

I was only 3MB off wrt. mainline's 64GB LowTotal, not bad at all:

HighTotal:    65134592 kB
HighFree:     65116864 kB
LowTotal:       176076 kB
LowFree:        144180 kB

Turns out NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG was avoided. I'll dig up whatever else
I can here. AIM7 with 10000 tasks and various other things were runnable
on 48GB, but I still need to straighten various fragmentation things out
before benching produces meaningful numbers instead of runs vs. doesn't.


-- wli

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 21:08:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030328050839.GP1350@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030115105802.GQ940@holomorphy.com>

On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:58:02AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Minor extrapolation: aside from potential explosions in very unusual
> corner cases, with these hacks/workarounds 64GB NUMA-Q should boot and
> run (slowly) with an approximate LowTotal of 173296 kB. The main obstacle
> is our setup here would require an additional NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG
> patch, and there isn't much local interest in even seeing whether or how
> poorly it would run without working patches (e.g. hugh's MMUPAGE_SIZE that
> I'm fwd. porting) to do something about runaway mem_map lowmem consumption.

I was only 3MB off wrt. mainline's 64GB LowTotal, not bad at all:

HighTotal:    65134592 kB
HighFree:     65116864 kB
LowTotal:       176076 kB
LowFree:        144180 kB

Turns out NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG was avoided. I'll dig up whatever else
I can here. AIM7 with 10000 tasks and various other things were runnable
on 48GB, but I still need to straighten various fragmentation things out
before benching produces meaningful numbers instead of runs vs. doesn't.


-- wli
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-28  4:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-15 10:58 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-15 10:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-15 11:24 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-01-15 11:55   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-15 12:32     ` Anton Blanchard
2003-01-15 13:10       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-15 15:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-15 15:24   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-15 15:34   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-15 15:34     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-19  1:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-19  1:50   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-19  2:13     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-01-19  2:27       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-19  2:32     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-01-19  2:55       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-19  3:08         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-28  5:08 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-03-28  5:08   ` William Lee Irwin III
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-15 17:32 Protasevich, Natalie
2003-01-15 22:01 ` Martin J. Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030328050839.GP1350@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.