From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: possible bug - fsck shows perfect results, linux refuses to mount Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:00:14 +0400 Message-ID: <20030331120014.C25533@namesys.com> References: <20030331072250.GC22731@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> <20030331113446.A31858@namesys.com> <20030331074957.GD22731@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030331074957.GD22731@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Robin H. Johnson" Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello! On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:49:57PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > Can you please make a metadata dump for us? > > "debugreiserfs -p /dev/hdb1 | bzip2 -9c >metadata.bz2" and make this file > > available for us to download. > Stderr output of debugreiserfs here: > http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/~robbat2/reiserfs/debugreiserfs.run "bread: Cannot read the block (18)." Well, now this is something. Do you have I/O errors messages in kernel logs, or do you know another reason for it to fail reading 18th block? Perhaps try to run "badblocks -b 4096" to find out if there are more blocks that cannot be read? > > Thank you. > No, most definitely thank you. Now I have more ammunition against my boss > as to why Open Source is better. You guys really rock. I'd never get a > response from any other vendor this quickly (even though we pay some of > them a fair sum). We accept money too ;) > A question for you, so I can support things. Is there a list somewhere > of features requested, and how much you money you want to be paid to add > them in? Especially the smaller features (hint hint). Well, there is http://namesys.com/support.html , as of features, usually we expect customers to come up with features they need. If you lack something in reiserfs and you are willing to pay, we can implement it. If you are happy with the current features-set, why to pay for features that would be never used? Bye, Oleg