From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernd Schubert Subject: Re: nfsd-fh: found a name that I didn't expect Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:49:33 +0200 Message-ID: <200303311249.33139.bernd-schubert@web.de> References: <200303281828.55093.bernd-schubert@web.de> <200303301708.11703.bernd-schubert@web.de> <20030331142406.Q25533@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20030331142406.Q25533@namesys.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Oleg Drokin , reiserfs@nn7.de Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Monday 31 March 2003 12:24, Oleg Drokin wrote: Hello Oleg! > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > Anyway I also tested the kernel-patch, but it causes problems with mounts > > from another nfs-server. Well, mounting works fine, but e.g. running 'ls > > Ah, stupid me. > I have another patch that we created before iget5_locked backport. > It's a bit of hack to beat the race, but it works (fixes the race). > It does not touch any code outside of reiserfs. > So if you apply that to 2.4.20 and see if you still can see the NFS problem > over time... > Patch is below. Thanks a lot for both new patches, I will try them as soon as possible, though it is usually more difficult to reboot during the week (so it may become the next weekend, before I can try it). Anyway I will also try it on our data server, where we also see those messages from time to time, even without rebooting. Best regards, Bernd