From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: possible bug - fsck shows perfect results, linux refuses to mount Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:33:51 +0400 Message-ID: <20030331153351.B1527@namesys.com> References: <20030331113446.A31858@namesys.com> <20030331074957.GD22731@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> <20030331120014.C25533@namesys.com> <20030331083758.GA23518@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> <20030331125652.H25533@namesys.com> <20030331091621.GA23666@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> <20030331132454.L25533@namesys.com> <20030331101714.GA23949@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> <20030331143623.R25533@namesys.com> <20030331111332.GC23949@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030331111332.GC23949@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Robin H. Johnson" Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello! On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 03:13:32AM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > Next step is getting that data to you. I'm running bzip2 -9vvkz on the > > > dd'd contents of the drive now, I expect that to take a few hours. > > > Depending on the size of the output, I'll either see about getting the > > > data up on a relatively high speed site somewhere, or splitting it into > > > two parts and sending them to you on DVD-R if you can accept those? > > Also you can just give me a shell on your box, so that I can tweak and > > recompile reiserfsprogs (btw, you are not using debugreiserfs from > > reiserfsprogs v3.6.5), also I need r/w access to the file containing > > copy of partition data. > > In order for me to be able to verify mountability of partition I need > > a way to mount/umount it). > I'm afraid I can't do that Dave. Shells are out of the question. It Ok, I fully understand that. > opens up too many possible security holes. Paranoid I am. > At the present rate, it looks like it will be at least 50% compression, > I'm thinking more since the drive was about 60% full. Ok. We will look at code meanwhile to see why it might have done lseek on stdin. > ~5gb would be an acceptable download I think, split into 10x512Mb parts, > using MD5SUMS. > I was going to upgrade to it, but it seems Gentoo currently has some > issues with it, so I'm holding off on it. You can uild it yourself if you want, or I can supply you with binary. Bye, Oleg