All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Antonio Vargas <wind@cocodriloo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Subject: Re: fairsched + O(1) process scheduler
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:35:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030402163512.GC993@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030402124643.GA13168@wind.cocodriloo.com>

On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 02:46:43PM +0200, Antonio Vargas wrote:
+static inline void update_user_timeslices(void)
...
+	list_for_each(entry, &user_list) {
+		user = list_entry(entry, struct user_struct, uid_list);
+
+		if(!user) continue;
+
+		if(0){
+			user_time_slice = user->time_slice;

Hmm, this looks very O(n)... BTW, doesn't uidhash_lock lock user_list?


On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 02:46:43PM +0200, Antonio Vargas wrote:
> @@ -39,10 +42,12 @@ struct user_struct root_user = {
>  static inline void uid_hash_insert(struct user_struct *up, struct list_head *hashent)
>  {
>  	list_add(&up->uidhash_list, hashent);
> +	list_add(&up->uid_list, &user_list);
>  }

Okay, there are three or four problems:

(1) uidhash_lock can't be taken in interrupt context
(2) you aren't taking uidhash_lock at all in update_user_timeslices()
(3) you're not actually handing out user timeslices due to an if (0)
(4) walking user_list is O(n)


-- wli

  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-02 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-01 12:51 fairsched + O(1) process scheduler Antonio Vargas
2003-04-01 16:41 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-01 22:19   ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-02 12:46     ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-02 16:35       ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-04-02 21:36         ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-02 21:35           ` Robert Love
2003-04-02 22:07             ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-02 22:10               ` Robert Love
2003-04-02 22:35                 ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-03 17:15                 ` Corey Minyard
2003-04-03 18:17                   ` Robert Love
     [not found]     ` <200304021144.21924.frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
2003-04-03 12:53       ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-03 19:22         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-04 11:27           ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-04 14:04             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-04 20:12               ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-04 20:40                 ` William Lee Irwin III
     [not found]             ` <200304041453.16630.frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
2003-04-04 21:36               ` Antonio Vargas
     [not found]                 ` <200304081456.34367.frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
2003-04-08 20:19                   ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-01 18:33 ` Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030402163512.GC993@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=wind@cocodriloo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.