From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:29:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:29:02 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:10042 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:29:02 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:40:26 -0500 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: Pete Zaitcev , James Simmons , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why moving driver includes ? Message-ID: <20030402204026.A15082@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <200304030045.h330jok10685@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <3E8B8F31.5030407@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3E8B8F31.5030407@redhat.com>; from drepper@redhat.com on Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 05:32:33PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 17:32:33 -0800 > From: Ulrich Drepper > > Yeah, but what does it have to do with kernel? You should have > > gotten Uli to add them to glibc. > > Headers like have no place in glibc either. There should be one or more > separate packages which distribute kernel headers. I can see your point, but imagine how many packages this is going to create. Shall we plead with Arjan to maintain glibc-kernelheaders as a community package, to be a clearinghouse for these things? -- Pete