From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: netfilter@interlinx.bc.ca Subject: Re: tcp-window-tracking vs. pending/24_conntrack-nosysctl.patch Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:57:58 -0500 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20030403135757.GB1702@pc.ilinx> References: <20030403025151.GA1702@pc.ilinx> <1049364942.25148.60.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50" Return-path: To: Netfilter Development Mailinglist Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1049364942.25148.60.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 12:15:43PM +0200, Martin Josefsson wrote: >=20 > Thanks for the report, I'll try to fix it up. Excellent! > The answer is that I don't have time to check all the time if everything > still applies after new stuff has been added to pom. No, of course not. My appologies if that is how my message came across. My question was more a case of, "should I report when this happens or is it to be expected with so many patches to be applied" (kinda like maintaining a kernel these days :-). You are welcome for the report in any case however. Thanx for the great work! b. --=20 Brian J. Murrell --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+jD3ll3EQlGLyuXARAoGvAKDWpX3y6iOJQRxGCMRAkgJDF3Oc5gCggvQv nDPjv/u78KnplODbu0dLM5w= =PJSb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50--