From: Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com>
To: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: PnP code causes build failure?
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 10:57:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200304081457.h38EvW014624@linuxaudiosystems.com> (raw)
Just updated from CVS. Using 2.4.20 with gcc 2.95.3.
two things related to PnP that are causing problems. First, at
configure time:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
checking for PnP driver in kernel... no
checking for ISA PnP support... yes
./configure: test: ==: binary operator expected
Symlinking <linux/isapnp.h>...
./configure: test: ==: binary operator expected
Symlinking <linux/pnp.h>...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then, at compile time, even asking only for non-PnP cards:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
pnp.c: In function `parse_id':
pnp.c:110: `ISAPNP_ANY_ID' undeclared (first use in this function)
pnp.c:110: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
pnp.c:110: for each function it appears in.)
pnp.c: At top level:
pnp.c:130: redefinition of `pnp_request_card_device'
pnp.h:203: `pnp_request_card_device' previously defined here
pnp.c:143: redefinition of `pnp_release_card_device'
pnp.h:204: `pnp_release_card_device' previously defined here
pnp.c:150: redefinition of `pnp_register_card_driver'
pnp.h:205: `pnp_register_card_driver' previously defined here
pnp.c:199: redefinition of `pnp_unregister_card_driver'
pnp.h:206: `pnp_unregister_card_driver' previously defined here
pnp.c:218: redefinition of `pnp_register_driver'
pnp.h:207: `pnp_register_driver' previously defined here
pnp.c:249: redefinition of `pnp_unregister_driver'
pnp.h:208: `pnp_unregister_driver' previously defined here
pnp.c:267: redefinition of `pnp_init_resource_table'
pnp.h:209: `pnp_init_resource_table' previously defined here
pnp.c:297: redefinition of `pnp_manual_config_dev'
pnp.h:210: `pnp_manual_config_dev' previously defined here
pnp.c:328: redefinition of `pnp_activate_dev'
pnp.h:211: `pnp_activate_dev' previously defined here
make[2]: *** [pnp.o] Error 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-08 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-08 14:57 Paul Davis [this message]
2003-04-08 15:14 ` PnP code causes build failure? Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200304081457.h38EvW014624@linuxaudiosystems.com \
--to=paul@linuxaudiosystems.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.