From: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>
To: Mike Uhler <uhler@mips.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, jsun@mvista.com
Subject: Re: way selection bit for multi-way cache
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:55:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030410115552.F9002@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200304101850.h3AIorK11089@uhler-linux.mips.com>; from uhler@mips.com on Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:50:53AM -0700
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:50:53AM -0700, Mike Uhler wrote:
> >
> > If a cache is multi-way set associative cache, one must
> > select the way for indexed cache operations.
> >
> > The most common way selection is to use MSBs in the addressing
> > range of the whole cache size. In other word, a two-way
> > cache of size d would use bit (log(d)-1) to select the way.
> >
> > Some other CPUs often the LSB(s) in the address to select
> > ways. Examples include R5432, R5500, TX49, TX39. Does
> > anybody know other such CPUs?
> >
> > And I think I have seen a third kind way selection, but I
> > can't remember which CPU it is. Does anybody know any
> > other way selection schemes?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Jun
> >
>
> I can't comment on anything but MIPS32 and MIPS64 CPUs, but the
> MIPS32 and MIPS64 standard is to use the bits above the index field
> to specify the way.
Yes. This is same as the "most common case" as I said above.
Maybe this is a better way to phrase it. :)
Jun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-10 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-10 18:05 way selection bit for multi-way cache Jun Sun
2003-04-10 18:50 ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 18:55 ` Jun Sun [this message]
2003-04-10 19:24 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-10 19:37 ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 19:37 ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 20:09 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-10 20:28 ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 20:28 ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 20:52 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-11 6:33 ` Dominic Sweetman
2003-04-11 8:15 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2003-04-11 8:15 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2003-04-11 12:10 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-11 11:35 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030410115552.F9002@mvista.com \
--to=jsun@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=uhler@mips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.