From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Douglas Cole" Subject: Re: KDE EchoLinux client development started Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:11:43 -0700 Sender: linux-hams-owner@localhost Message-ID: <200304102111.43686.n7bfs@qwest.net> References: <200304072004.55533.ve3mtm@rac.ca> <20030408141909.A30053@pull.privacy.nb.ca> <200304102146.01378.ve3mtm@rac.ca> Reply-To: n7bfs@qwest.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200304102146.01378.ve3mtm@rac.ca> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Michael Melanson , LINUX HAMS MAILING LIST On Thursday 10 April 2003 14:45, Michael Melanson wrote: > I have started, pending the acception of the Sourceforge project, but I > haven't uploaded anything yet (It's not much yet) > > As for the Qt/GTK debate, I can do either. I chose Qt because that's what > I've used more, but that's by no means a binding reason. I have used GTK, > but that's a long time ago and not much at that. If the general concensus > is to use GTK, then I'll register a new SF project with a non-KDE name > > This project will not implement the EchoLink protocol. That's done by > EchoLinux, which will run as a child process of this program. > > I welcome any other input > > > - Michael VE3MTM > ve3mtm@rac.ca Whip me beat me hang me out to dry, but if I had a choice, having an ncurses interface so that one could run it from a console/limited hardware would be kinda fun :^) Second choice would be QT. Third would be Kylix. Fourth would be GTK... Just my two pennies. Thanks for sharing what my dumb brain just doesn't seem to want to do (write software). 73 -- Douglas Cole N7BFS Spokane IRLP node owner AMSAT#26182 , K2 # 544 http://www.users.qwest.net/~cdoug3 Registered Linux user # 188922