From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: rebuild-tree hangs Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:22:18 +0400 Message-ID: <20030414092218.A27531@namesys.com> References: <20030411015312.GA20912@coloppl> <200304111356.18574.vitaly@namesys.com> <20030411121321.2a3686b2.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <200304111620.27377.vitaly@namesys.com> <20030411161443.6ebc8b71.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <3E998ADA.2080502@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E998ADA.2080502@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hans Reiser Cc: Philippe Gramoull? , Vitaly Fertman , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello! On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 08:05:46PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote: > >Personally, i always build reiserfsck statically for the reasons i > >mentioned above but i'm sure > >there are other environments that would require the smallest tools. > Most people boot from CDROMS now, so Philippe's suggestion seems like a > good one to me. We agreed with Vitaly that he will implement "--build-fsck-statucally" kind of configure switch for those who want static fack. Aternatively we can change it to build always static fsck, unless "--build-fsck-dynamically" kind of configure switch is supplied. Bye, Oleg