From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264161AbTDOE0z (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 00:26:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264168AbTDOE0z (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 00:26:55 -0400 Received: from granite.he.net ([216.218.226.66]:54532 "EHLO granite.he.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264161AbTDOE0y (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 00:26:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 21:41:06 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" Cc: "'Miquel van Smoorenburg'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: Simple Kernel-User Event Interface (Was: RE: [ANNOUNCE] udev 0.1 release) Message-ID: <20030415044106.GB8403@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 01:52:38AM -0700, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: > > Looks like a good start, but I'm not moving the hotplug interface over > > to it :) > > Good try - I won't let go :) If you see this as something potentially > useful, how would you like it to develop so that in the long term > it can be used? be it in parallel with /sbin/hotplug or as a > potential replacement? I don't know. Even if we decide to change, this is a 2.7 thing. > I guess that the first thing I would have to do is somehow look into > how hotplug is behaving now and hook it to do something similar, right? That would be a good start :) thanks, greg k-h