From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qdisc oops fix
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:43:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030415134305.GF15944@louise.pinerecords.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030415084706.O1131@shell.cyberus.ca>
> [hadi@cyberus.ca]
>
> I dont understand why
>
> - sch = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + sch = kmalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> mysteriously fixes the problem? Could the problem be elsewhere?
> Can you repost what the issue was? I am not on lk and i just saw the
> posting on a web page.
Here.
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:21:37 +0200
From: Martin Volf <mv@inv.cz>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: qdisc misbehavior detected at slab.c:1128 + fix
Hello,
when loading hundreds of QoS rules by tc on SMP machine (2 Xeons with HT) right after booting the system, I always get kernel BUG at slab.c:1128:
ksymoops 2.4.8 on i686 2.4.20. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.20/ (default)
-m /boot/System.map (specified)
kernel BUG at slab.c:1128!
invalid operand: 0000
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[<c01367b8>] Not tainted
Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
EFLAGS: 00010202
eax: 000001f0 ebx: 00000000 ecx: 000001f0 edx: 00000000
esi: dfff9450 edi: 000001f0 ebp: dc7bda00 esp: dc5e3bfc
ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Process tc (pid: 303, stackpage=dc5e3000)
Stack: 00000246 000001f0 000001f0 dfff9458 dfff9460 dfff9450 00000246 000001f0
dc7bda00 c01376fd dfff9450 000001f0 000001f0 dc652e00 c02d3a60 dc711460
dc7bda00 c021b809 dfff9450 000001f0 c15fea00 00000064 dc652e00 dc5b8034
Call Trace: [<c01376fd>] [<c021b809>] [<e0a4b71d>] [<e0a48108>] [<c021d5aa>]
[<e0a4d1e0>] [<c0219b18>] [<c0219740>] [<c0219450>] [<c022121a>] [<c02209f1>]
[<c0220f71>] [<c020a5c5>] [<c020bce7>] [<c0130010>] [<c012d5b5>] [<c012d821>]
[<c0117f48>] [<c020b11d>] [<c020c1d6>] [<c0117dc0>] [<c0107800>] [<c010770f>]
Code: 0f 0b 68 04 f9 63 27 c0 c7 44 24 0c 01 00 00 00 89 c8 25 f0
>>EIP; c01367b8 <kmem_cache_grow+58/270> <=====
>>esi; dfff9450 <_end+1fc91518/20686128>
>>ebp; dc7bda00 <_end+1c455ac8/20686128>
>>esp; dc5e3bfc <_end+1c27bcc4/20686128>
Trace; c01376fd <__kmem_cache_alloc+6d/140>
Trace; c021b809 <qdisc_create_dflt+29/c0>
Trace; e0a4b71d <[sch_htb]htb_change_class+40d/600>
Trace; e0a48108 <[sch_htb]htb_find+58/70>
Trace; c021d5aa <tc_ctl_tclass+14a/2b0>
Trace; e0a4d1e0 <[sch_htb]htb_class_ops+0/0>
Trace; c0219b18 <rtnetlink_rcv_msg+1a8/26d>
Trace; c0219740 <rtnetlink_rcv+c0/1e0>
Trace; c0219450 <rtnetlink_dump_ifinfo+0/90>
Trace; c022121a <netlink_data_ready+7a/80>
Trace; c02209f1 <netlink_unicast+281/330>
Trace; c0220f71 <netlink_sendmsg+1f1/290>
Trace; c020a5c5 <sock_sendmsg+75/c0>
Trace; c020bce7 <sys_sendmsg+1b7/210>
Trace; c0130010 <do_buffer_fdatasync+30/b0>
Trace; c012d5b5 <do_anonymous_page+115/130>
Trace; c012d821 <handle_mm_fault+81/120>
Trace; c0117f48 <do_page_fault+188/523>
Trace; c020b11d <sys_socket+3d/60>
Trace; c020c1d6 <sys_socketcall+246/270>
Trace; c0117dc0 <do_page_fault+0/523>
Trace; c0107800 <error_code+34/3c>
Trace; c010770f <system_call+33/38>
Code; c01367b8 <kmem_cache_grow+58/270>
00000000 <_EIP>:
Code; c01367b8 <kmem_cache_grow+58/270> <=====
0: 0f 0b ud2a <=====
Code; c01367ba <kmem_cache_grow+5a/270>
2: 68 04 f9 63 27 push $0x2763f904
Code; c01367bf <kmem_cache_grow+5f/270>
7: c0 c7 44 rol $0x44,%bh
Code; c01367c2 <kmem_cache_grow+62/270>
a: 24 0c and $0xc,%al
Code; c01367c4 <kmem_cache_grow+64/270>
c: 01 00 add %eax,(%eax)
Code; c01367c6 <kmem_cache_grow+66/270>
e: 00 00 add %al,(%eax)
Code; c01367c8 <kmem_cache_grow+68/270>
10: 89 c8 mov %ecx,%eax
Code; c01367ca <kmem_cache_grow+6a/270>
12: 25 f0 00 00 00 and $0xf0,%eax
<0>Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
On UP machine even with SMP kernel (the same configuration) it never happened. Guided by the comment in slab.c:1122 I tried (without knowing what I was doing;-) following little patch to net/sched/sch_generic.c and it seems to fix it.
--- sch_generic.c.orig 2003-01-04 14:42:02.000000000 +0100
+++ sch_generic.c 2003-04-12 08:58:34.000000000 +0200
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@
struct Qdisc *sch;
int size = sizeof(*sch) + ops->priv_size;
- sch = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ sch = kmalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!sch)
return NULL;
memset(sch, 0, size);
Is it the correct fix?
Thanks,
Martin Volf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-15 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-15 13:09 [PATCH] qdisc oops fix jamal
2003-04-15 13:43 ` Tomas Szepe [this message]
2003-04-15 14:31 ` jamal
2003-04-15 21:10 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-04-16 5:41 ` Catalin BOIE
2003-04-16 11:49 ` jamal
2003-04-16 15:23 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-04-16 16:06 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-04-16 16:52 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-04-16 18:03 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-04-16 18:18 ` jamal
2003-04-16 21:44 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-04-17 5:25 ` Catalin BOIE
2003-04-16 18:39 ` jamal
2003-04-16 19:43 ` Julian Anastasov
2003-04-17 6:06 ` Catalin BOIE
2003-04-17 10:55 ` jamal
2003-04-18 6:47 ` Catalin BOIE
2003-04-17 5:13 ` Catalin BOIE
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-15 22:42 Julian Anastasov
2003-04-16 0:53 ` jamal
2003-04-16 6:30 ` devik
2003-04-16 7:24 ` Julian Anastasov
2003-04-15 8:18 Tomas Szepe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030415134305.GF15944@louise.pinerecords.com \
--to=szepe@pinerecords.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.