From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Eli Carter <eli.carter@inet.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: .section ... "ax" vs #alloc, #execinstr
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:05:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030416000545.H32468@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E9C664A.503@inet.com>; from eli.carter@inet.com on Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 03:06:34PM -0500
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 03:06:34PM -0500, Eli Carter wrote:
> Some of the assembly files use
> .section ".start", "ax"
> and others use
> .section ".start", #alloc, #execinstr
> (and not just for .start, try
> find -name \*.S | xargs grep -e '\.section'
> )
>
> These appear to be equivelent, if not somebody clue me in please. :)
> Which is the prefered form? The latter seems to provide a bit more for
> the human, so I'd vote that direction... ;)
I guess you're asking about the IOP3xx stuff.
info as
mp<tab>
msec<tab>
gives all the details. To summarise though:
"a" or "#alloc" - the section is allocatable
"x" or "#execinstr" - the section is executable
"ax" seems to be what Linus uses. I used to use the long versions, but
changed to the shorter version - less characters to type, but still
fairly readable. After all, you don't catch people trying to make ls
report stuff like:
file, user read write execute, group read execute, other read execute,
2 links, owner root, group root, 44 kibytes, modified xxxx, name "foo"
(or I hope you don't! 8))
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-15 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-15 20:06 .section ... "ax" vs #alloc, #execinstr Eli Carter
2003-04-15 23:05 ` Russell King [this message]
2003-04-15 23:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030416000545.H32468@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=eli.carter@inet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.