From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264282AbTDPKAz (for ); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:00:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264283AbTDPKAz (for ); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:00:55 -0400 Received: from [12.47.58.203] ([12.47.58.203]:53473 "EHLO pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264282AbTDPKAx (for ); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:00:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:13:03 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: 76306.1226@compuserve.com, mru@users.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: DMA transfers in 2.5.67 Message-Id: <20030416031303.76779cac.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030416031144.613b0cc7.akpm@digeo.com> References: <200304160548_MC3-1-349F-E844@compuserve.com> <20030416031144.613b0cc7.akpm@digeo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Apr 2003 10:12:41.0038 (UTC) FILETIME=[B6D43EE0:01C30400] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > > Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> wrote: > > > > # mount /ext3_fs > > # time dd if=/ext3_fs/100MiB_file of=/dev/null bs=32k > > > > 2.4.20aa1 : 3.3 sec (exactly what I expect to see) > > 2.5.66 : 6.6 sec > > With this test 2.4 will leave a lot more unwritten dirty data in memory. > > You should include a `sync' in the timings. Well you should include the sync if you're writing to disk ;) doh.