From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BK+PATCH] remove __constant_memcpy
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 05:11:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030417051126.W13397@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030417090444.A4209@devserv.devel.redhat.com>; from arjanv@redhat.com on Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:04:44AM +0000
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:04:44AM +0000, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:02:43AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 17 Apr 2003, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > > it can do that ANYWAY for all kinds of things.
> > > We really should ask the gcc folks to add a
> > > -fdontyoudareusefloatingpoint flag (well different name probably) to
> > > make sure it never ever will generate FP code. (would also help catch
> > > abusers of FP code in the kernel as a bonus ;)
> >
> > -msoft-float?
>
> that is a decent start but has a different effect, eg it doesnt' actually
> forbid gcc from generatic fpu code, just tells it to use emu lib functions
> for it .
But the emu lib functions aren't provided in the kernel, so you'll get
errors anyway.
On some targets the option is -mno-fpu though (e.g. sparc* kernels use
it for eons).
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-17 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-17 0:57 [BK+PATCH] remove __constant_memcpy Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 1:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 2:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-17 8:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-04-17 9:02 ` Roman Zippel
2003-04-17 9:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-04-17 9:11 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2003-04-17 16:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-17 19:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 19:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-17 23:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 23:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-18 0:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-18 9:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-04-18 14:31 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-18 15:07 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-04-17 22:58 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-04-17 23:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 13:17 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-17 13:17 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-17 14:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 14:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 20:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-17 2:22 Nakajima, Jun
2003-04-17 23:50 Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030417051126.W13397@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.