From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vitaly Fertman Subject: Re: Gentoo bug 17974 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 21:14:35 +0400 Message-ID: <200304172114.35013.vitaly@namesys.com> References: <20030417164911.GK9893@lostlogicx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20030417164911.GK9893@lostlogicx.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Brandon Low Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hi, On Thursday 17 April 2003 20:49, Brandon Low wrote: > Hey, this bug was originally about the flush_buffers bug which Vitaly > kindaly provided me a patch for, however if you look at the last severa= l > comment #25 and on, at least one user is having a different issue with = the > new reiserfsprogs. My current thought is that it is some kind of actua= l > corruption of his journal, but I would appreciate any input you may hav= e. There is a new check for journal parameters were added which helps to=20 recover fs with relocated journal and in a few other cases. These paramet= ers=20 were not stored correctly in old kernels before relocated journal appeare= d.=20 This is nothing to worry about, and you can fix with fsck --rebuild-sb he= lp=20 - say there to fix parameters in the jouranl by ones from the super block= =2E --=20 Thanks, Vitaly Fertman