From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH] take2: new module infrastructure for net_proto_family Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 13:10:08 -0300 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20030420161008.GC8399@conectiva.com.br> References: <20030419233408.GG6251@conectiva.com.br> <20030419.184122.74731778.davem@redhat.com> <20030420160218.GB8399@conectiva.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030420160218.GB8399@conectiva.com.br> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Em Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 01:02:18PM -0300, Arnaldo C. Melo escreveu: > Em Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 06:41:22PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: > > Note that, eventually we'll need to handle the struct sock side of this > > equation. Consider that struct sock's can exist long after the user struct > > socket is closed (TCP is the best example), yet they reference internals to > > the protocol module (via sk and skb callbacks, hash table linkage, etc.). > > humm, I'll work on this later today, tweaking sk_alloc/sk_free. as net_families is static in net/socket.c we'll need npf_get and npf_put (net proto family get/put), is the naming OK for you? > > We can deal with this later, let's merge your stuff in first. > > Thanks, now to easter lunch :-) > > - Arnaldo