From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262620AbTDUV5K (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:57:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262621AbTDUV5J (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:57:09 -0400 Received: from cerebus.wirex.com ([65.102.14.138]:52218 "EHLO figure1.int.wirex.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262620AbTDUV5E (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:57:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 15:04:37 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Zoltan NAGY , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: grsecurity in 2.5? Message-ID: <20030421150437.B11883@figure1.int.wirex.com> Mail-Followup-To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Zoltan NAGY , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200304212145.h3LLjRM8002371@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200304212145.h3LLjRM8002371@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>; from Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu on Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 05:45:26PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu) wrote: > On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:37:38 +0200, Zoltan NAGY said: > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Greg KH wrote: > > > What's the status of that patch being ported to the LSM interface (which > > > is already in 2.5)? > > > > AFAIK there was a discussion about it, but i dont know what decision has > > born.. > > Some parts of grsecurity were trivial to fit into the LSM framework. Other > parts are basically impossible simply because LSM doesn't hook into the > code where it's needed.... Yes, hence the lack of motivation to bring over just the portable parts. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net