From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pete Subject: Re: [example PATCH - not for applying] exclude certain commands Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030424155629.15803.qmail@web9902.mail.yahoo.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from web9902.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.129.37]:41990 "HELO web9902.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263764AbTDXPoU (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:44:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, afafc@rnl.ist.utl.pt, greg@kroah.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, mike@hingston.demon.co.uk, pwkpete@yahoo.com, stelian@popies.net Andries, > [In other words, afafc@rnl.ist.utl.pt, mike@hingston.demon.co.uk, > pwkpete@yahoo.com, stelian@popies.net: did you compare 2.5.68 > without and with this "if (len < 8) len = 8" patch?] > The failures I was seeing was with 2.5.68, after adding your patch the error went away, but never tried the .67 kernel. I still have the entire kernel error log of the failure case if that is of interest. Regards, -Pete __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com