All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IEEE-1394 problem on init [ was Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc1 ]
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:41:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030424214107.GH808@phunnypharm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030424173619.11734F-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 05:44:39PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> > I guess Ben's mega patch (and yes, I also consider it a megapatch for
> > -rc) has to be applied. I just mailed him asking about the possibility
> > of getting only fixes in and not the cleanups, but I guess that might be a
> > bit hard to do _today_. Right Ben ?
> > 
> > And about the sweet complaints about -pre timing, I will release -pre's
> > each damn week for .22.
> > 
> > *!@#!&*.
> 
> If I might offer a course of action, if you put thing which are *fixes* in
> the bk releases, and hold *changes* for the next -pre, it might allow
> people to grab bk's to fix the quickly caught things in a new pre, without
> being hit with major changes which might decrease stability.
> 
> Clearly any pre is a risk, but there always seem to be errors of the "XXX
> doesn't compile because of typo" type. That way Alan could put all new IDE
> code in each -pre and Andre and others could put fixes in the bk's until
> it worked. => JOKING!! <== but you get the idea.
> 
> I'd love to see this in 2.5 as well, just to encourage people to use it!

You do realize that the -pre's are pulled from bk, right?

-- 
Debian     - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo       - http://www.deqo.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-24 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-23 12:29 IEEE-1394 problem on init [ was Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc1 ] Tony Spinillo
2003-04-23 12:53 ` Stelian Pop
2003-04-23 13:01   ` Ben Collins
2003-04-23 13:22     ` Stelian Pop
2003-04-23 13:32       ` Ben Collins
2003-04-23 13:46         ` Ben Collins
2003-04-23 13:58         ` Stelian Pop
2003-04-23 13:54           ` Ben Collins
2003-04-23 14:21             ` Stelian Pop
2003-04-23 14:23               ` Ben Collins
2003-04-23 14:51                 ` Stelian Pop
2003-04-23 14:44                   ` Ben Collins
2003-04-23 14:48                   ` Ben Collins
2003-04-23 15:29                     ` Stelian Pop
2003-04-23 19:13                       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-04-23 19:05                         ` Ben Collins
2003-04-23 19:27                           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-04-23 20:20                         ` Stelian Pop
2003-04-23 20:24                           ` Ben Collins
2003-04-23 20:42                             ` Stelian Pop
2003-04-26  8:29                               ` The IEEE-1394 saga continued... [ was: IEEE-1394 problem on init ] Stelian Pop
2003-04-26 14:34                                 ` Ben Collins
2003-04-26 16:10                                   ` Stelian Pop
2003-04-26 16:12                                     ` Ben Collins
2003-04-26 17:00                                       ` Stelian Pop
2003-04-26 16:59                                         ` Ben Collins
2003-04-26 14:40                                 ` Ben Collins
2003-04-26 16:23                                   ` Stelian Pop
2003-04-26 16:25                                     ` Ben Collins
2003-04-26 17:15                                       ` Stelian Pop
2003-04-24 21:44                         ` IEEE-1394 problem on init [ was Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc1 ] Bill Davidsen
2003-04-24 21:41                           ` Ben Collins [this message]
2003-04-25 18:06                             ` Bill Davidsen
2003-04-25 18:16                               ` Ben Collins
2003-04-26 10:36                                 ` Bill Davidsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-21 18:47 Linux 2.4.21-rc1 Marcelo Tosatti
2003-04-23  7:59 ` IEEE-1394 problem on init [ was Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc1 ] Stelian Pop

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030424214107.GH808@phunnypharm.org \
    --to=bcollins@debian.org \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.