From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: trouble with reiserfs on ppc vs-3050: wait_buffer_until_released ... Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:46:30 +0400 Message-ID: <20030425094630.GH10802@namesys.com> References: <1051258287.5564.1.camel@fortknox> <1051259723.3513.7.camel@localhost> <20030425084742.GA22827@namesys.com> <1051261556.3513.31.camel@localhost> <20030425091916.GG10802@namesys.com> <1051263219.1642.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1051263219.1642.10.camel@localhost> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Soeren Sonnenburg Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello! On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 11:33:40AM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > > > > There are no known endianness issues in reiserfs code now. > > > > You di not had reboot or something like that after you copied the data over? > > > I rebooted ... it is the /home partition. > > Do you start reiserfsck on boot (3.6.6 one?) ? > > Was the reboot clean? > Hmmhhh, I can now access the file (after I did --fix-fixable) ... > strange. I also rebooted and checked the fs again... it reports to be > ok. Well, fsck is expected to fix things. The strange thing is how you get into error state. > IIRC there was no unclean reboot before that vs-3050 thing appeared. Hm. But do you run reiserfsck on boot? > Or could this be caused by "repartitioning but not reboot and then > mkreiserfs" ? I did not reboot as the last partition was hfs+ and all I > did was deleting+creating a linux partition instead... Well, if fdisk told you to reboot and you did not, this is bad, but it may not cause such things. > Can one check whether partition sizes are the same as reiserfs thinks ? Sure. reiserfsck does this. (it checks that fs is less or equal than underlying block device) > Count of blocks on the device: 5476231 (20.89016342163085937500 G) > /dev/hda7 Apple_UNIX_SVR2 home 43809856 @ 73400384 ( 20.9G) Linux native This looks close enough, but is subject to rounding errors ;) Bye, Oleg