From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE & stack location
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:06:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030425220608.GT8978@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3sms644zz.fsf@averell.firstfloor.org>
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com> writes:
>> Is there any good reason we can't remove TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE, and just shove
>> libraries directly above the program text? Red Hat seems to have patches to
>> dynamically tune it on a per-processes basis anyway ...
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 11:54:56PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Yes. You won't get a continuous sbrk/brk heap then anymore. Not sure it is a
> big problem though.
> But apparently Solaris/x86 is doing that.
> It's probably worth a sysctl at least.
How about a personality? It is a very slightly different ABI.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-25 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030425204012$4424@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-04-25 21:54 ` TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE & stack location Andi Kleen
2003-04-25 22:06 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-04-25 22:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-25 23:02 Chuck Ebbert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-25 23:02 Chuck Ebbert
[not found] <20030425220018$6219@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030425220018$76b1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030425225007$3fae@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-04-25 22:58 ` Andi Kleen
2003-04-25 23:13 ` Hui Huang
2003-04-25 20:32 Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-25 20:32 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-25 21:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-25 21:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-25 21:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-25 22:02 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-25 22:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-25 23:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-25 23:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-26 0:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-26 0:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-04-26 5:15 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-26 10:40 ` jlnance
2003-04-26 15:39 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-25 23:52 ` badari
2003-04-25 23:52 ` badari
2003-04-25 23:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-25 23:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-26 14:37 ` Rik van Riel
2003-04-26 14:37 ` Rik van Riel
2003-04-26 15:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-26 15:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030425220608.GT8978@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.