From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: [PATCH] patch-o-matic fixes Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:49:57 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20030430214957.GA8011@alpha.home.local> References: <20030430085332.GA32392@alpha.home.local> <20030430153222.GC685@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <1051717921.8200.151.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> <20030430162835.GA4546@alpha.home.local> <1051721066.8214.158.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Willy Tarreau , Harald Welte , Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Martin Josefsson Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1051721066.8214.158.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 06:44:26PM +0200, Martin Josefsson wrote: > Please get a current patch-o-matic from cvs and try again. I've just rechecked with a fresh 2.4.20 + patch-2.4.21-rc1 + cset-1.1141 from kernel.org, and a fresh p-o-m-20030429 from netfilter.org, and I can only reproduce the problem if I don't enable 24_conntrack-nosysctl (as you said). Once it's applied, tcp-window-tracking applies correctly. I don't really know why I wasn't including it, because I had marked it as one to avoid because of a conflict it would have caused in an earlier version, or against a broken kernel... Strange... > > pending/12_conntrack_nat_dependancy > > This patch doesn't even exist in p-o-m anymore. Yes, I know that but it's still listed here because I maintain a list of patches to avoid, which makes frequent rebuilds far easier. > > extra/ip_conntrack-timeouts > > This one is incompatible with extra/tcp-window-tracking.patch > > The dependencies in p-o-m won't allow you to try applying both these > patches at the same time (unless you use force) I know, but it's on my avoid-list too, because if I apply it by mistake, I only see the conflict on the last one... tcp-window-tracking, so I prefer drop it from the start. Well, it seems that my list initiated to make my life easier fooled me instead, this time ! Thanks for your help, Harald and Martin, and sorry for the noise. Regards, Willy