Re: Kernel source tree splitting

[Balram Adlakha <b_adlakha@softhome.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1234 bytes --]

On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 07:54:03AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> 
> >> So there are many edits that needed to be done in lots of
> >> Kconfig and Makefiles if one selectively pulls or omits certain
> >> sub-directories.
> >
> > Indeed, I ran across the same thing a while back. Would be *really* nice to
> > fix, if only so some poor sod over a modem can download a smaller tarball,
> > or save some diskspace.
> 
>  I have seven source trees on disk right now.  Getting rid off all
> the archs but i386 would not only save tons of space, it would also
> make 'grep -r' go faster and stop spewing irrelevant hits for archs
> that I couldn't care less about.
> 
> 
> ------
>  Chuck
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

I agree with you. Making different trees for different archs will make the tarball much smaller. Usually people only use one architecture and the other code lies waste. I think this has been discussed many times but It really is worth doing.
-- 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]