From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove useless MOD_{INC,DEC}_USE_COUNT from sunrpc
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 10:29:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030505102940.A16955@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030504.131558.27788112.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Sun, May 04, 2003 at 01:15:58PM -0700
On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 01:15:58PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 23:00:11 +0200
>
> Oh well, what about something like the following?
> ...
> + */
> + if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
> + return -EBUSY;
>
> Ahem... Why don't we just do this right? :-)
>
> By this I mean provide some real registry thing in the
> main kernel image that we can use to do try_module_get()
> outside of the sunrpc module?
Please read the comment above that piece of code. We always
enter this through an exported function so we know we currently
aren't unloadable.
> The other option is the make more progress in the area of
> two-stage module unload, and allowing cleanup() to return
> whether the module is unloadable or not. This is being
> discussed on netdev so that we have some way to make ipv6
> modules work sanely (instead of putting try_module_get() in
> every other line, that simply isn't acceptable).
That's fine with me, but I won't sign up to do that work :)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-05 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-04 17:14 [PATCH] remove useless MOD_{INC,DEC}_USE_COUNT from sunrpc Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-04 17:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-04 18:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-04 18:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-04 18:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-04 19:00 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-04 19:06 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-04 19:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-04 20:14 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-04 21:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-04 20:15 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-05 8:29 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030505102940.A16955@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.