All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
To: David.Mosberger@acm.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix vsyscall unwind information
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 09:34:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030505163444.GB9342@twiddle.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16054.32214.804891.702812@panda.mostang.com>

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 08:05:58AM -0700, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
>   Richard> Why?  Certainly it isn't needed for x86.
> 
> Certain applications (such as debuggers) want to know.  Sure, you can
> do symbol matching (if you have the symbol table) or code-reading
> (assuming you know the exact sigreturn sequence), but having a marker
> would be more reliable and faster.

Eh.  The whole point was to *eliminate* the special cases.

If the debugger does nothing special now, it'll see the symbol
from the VDSO in the backtrace and print __kernel_sigreturn.
Isn't this sufficient for the user to recognize what's going on?
Does it really need to print <signal frame>?



r~

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-05 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20030502004014$08e2@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <20030503210015$292c@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <20030504063010$279f@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-05-05  6:49     ` [PATCH] fix vsyscall unwind information David Mosberger-Tang
2003-05-05  7:42       ` Richard Henderson
2003-05-05 15:05         ` David Mosberger-Tang
2003-05-05 16:34           ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2003-05-05 16:55             ` David Mosberger-Tang
2003-05-05 23:10             ` Mark Kettenis
2003-05-06  0:21               ` Richard Henderson
2003-05-06  6:16                 ` David Mosberger-Tang
2003-05-02  0:33 [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSO implementation, take 2 Roland McGrath
2003-05-03 20:51 ` Richard Henderson
2003-05-04  6:21   ` [PATCH] fix vsyscall unwind information Richard Henderson
2003-05-04  7:34     ` Ulrich Drepper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030505163444.GB9342@twiddle.net \
    --to=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=David.Mosberger@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.