All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>
Cc: davem@redhat.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.69] Bug in sys_accept() module ref counts
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 21:14:19 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030507001418.GA27162@conectiva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305061223090.1348-100000@dyn9-47-18-140.beaverton.ibm.com>

Em Tue, May 06, 2003 at 12:28:41PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala escreveu:
> 
> I think there is a bug in the recent changes to sys_accept() to implement 
> module ref counts.

Yes, well spotted, small comment below, I'll be sending this patch
to DaveM, thanks a lot!
 
> module_put() gets called twice on error. Once via the explicit module_put and
> the second via sock_release(). Also i think we should do a __module_get() with 
> newsock's owner(although same as the original listening sock).
> 
> The following patch against 2.5.69 should fix the problem.
> 
> Thanks
> Sridhar
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> diff -Nru a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> --- a/net/socket.c	Tue May  6 12:14:35 2003
> +++ b/net/socket.c	Tue May  6 12:14:35 2003
> @@ -1280,26 +1280,26 @@
>  	 * We don't need try_module_get here, as the listening socket (sock)
>  	 * has the protocol module (sock->ops->owner) held.
>  	 */
> -	__module_get(sock->ops->owner);
> +	__module_get(newsock->ops->owner);

This one is OK, but the two operations are the same, so the effect, as well,
is the same, but for correctness, better have it with newsock.
  
>  	err = sock->ops->accept(sock, newsock, sock->file->f_flags);
>  	if (err < 0)
> -		goto out_module_put;
> +		goto out_release;
>  
>  	if (upeer_sockaddr) {
>  		if(newsock->ops->getname(newsock, (struct sockaddr *)address, &len, 2)<0) {
>  			err = -ECONNABORTED;
> -			goto out_module_put;
> +			goto out_release;
>  		}
>  		err = move_addr_to_user(address, len, upeer_sockaddr, upeer_addrlen);
>  		if (err < 0)
> -			goto out_module_put;
> +			goto out_release;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* File flags are not inherited via accept() unlike another OSes. */
>  
>  	if ((err = sock_map_fd(newsock)) < 0)
> -		goto out_module_put;
> +		goto out_release;
>  
>  	security_socket_post_accept(sock, newsock);
>  
> @@ -1307,8 +1307,6 @@
>  	sockfd_put(sock);
>  out:
>  	return err;
> -out_module_put:
> -	module_put(sock->ops->owner);
>  out_release:
>  	sock_release(newsock);
>  	goto out_put;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-07  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-06 19:28 [PATCH 2.5.69] Bug in sys_accept() module ref counts Sridhar Samudrala
2003-05-07  0:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2003-05-07  0:43   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030507001418.GA27162@conectiva.com.br \
    --to=acme@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.