From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Parse new-style boot parameters just before initcalls
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 12:05:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030512040100.C7B972C0D7@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 10 May 2003 18:19:36 +0200." <Pine.SOL.4.30.0305101735410.20755-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl>
In message <Pine.SOL.4.30.0305101735410.20755-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl> you w
rite:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've redone this patch. I've tested it and works okay for me.
> It is as minimal as possible and I hope it can go in 2.5 soon.
Only one request, that you push this slightly more, and make
setup_arch() call parse_early_args(). Does that break something?
That way the arch-specific parsing in setup_arch() can be converted to
__setup (but doesn't need to be: archs can take their time).
ie. we already have two-stage parsing, it'd be nice not to make it
three.
Minor nitpick:
> @@ -241,7 +279,7 @@ static int __init unknown_bootoption(cha
> val[-1] = '=';
>
> /* Handle obsolete-style parameters */
> - if (obsolete_checksetup(param))
> + if (obsolete_test_checksetup(param))
> return 0;
>
Change comment to /* Ignore early params: already done in
parse_early_args */ or something, and maybe rename
obsolete_test_checksetup() to is_early_setup().
Thanks!
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-12 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-10 16:19 [PATCH] Parse new-style boot parameters just before initcalls Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-05-10 16:25 ` [PATCH] Switch ide parameters to new-style and make them unique Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-05-11 14:59 ` Jeremy Jackson
2003-05-11 15:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-05-11 16:35 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-12 1:49 ` Jeremy Jackson
2003-05-12 6:37 ` Rusty Russell
2003-05-12 12:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-05-12 2:21 ` Rusty Russell
2003-05-12 2:05 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2003-05-12 12:05 ` [PATCH] Parse new-style boot parameters just before initcalls Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030512040100.C7B972C0D7@lists.samba.org \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.