From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262196AbTENHd7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 03:33:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262211AbTENHd7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 03:33:59 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:31118 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262196AbTENHd6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 03:33:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 09:46:26 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: fab@tlen.pl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, petero2@telia.com Subject: Re: Mount Rainier and kernel 2.6 Message-ID: <20030514074626.GA17033@suse.de> References: <20030514063216.2018C6EE92@rekin4.o2.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030514063216.2018C6EE92@rekin4.o2.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 14 2003, fab@tlen.pl wrote: > I would like to ask if support for Mount Rainier is inluded in 2.6 > kernel (as it was written in artice info on page > http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/kt20021021_189.html#3) No it isn't, at least not yet. As it just happens, my mt rainier drive is mounted in the 2.5 testbox though. If I get the time, I don't see any reason it can't make it into 2.6. It's a pretty simple addition now, ide-cd has write support etc. -- Jens Axboe