From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264283AbTEPFbU (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 01:31:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264293AbTEPFbT (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 01:31:19 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:15531 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264283AbTEPFaR (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 01:30:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 22:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20030515.224232.63031915.davem@redhat.com> To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au Cc: akpm@zip.com.au, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidm@hpl.hp.com, rth@twiddle.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unlimited per-cpu allocation From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20030516053654.F09242C07C@lists.samba.org> References: <20030516053654.F09242C07C@lists.samba.org> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Rusty Russell Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 15:30:36 +1000 D: This patch allows an unlimited number of per-cpu allocations. Except, of course, on IA64. Maybe I missed the end of some thread, but I thought we had all agreed that this kind of limitation was a showstopper.