From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Subject: Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 23:55:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030515035507.GA4654@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030513195928.GB16497@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:59:28PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > Just for completeness: I had to use:
> > > > GCCFLAGS += -mabi=32 -march=r4600 -mtune=r4600 -Wa,--trap
> > > > to make gcc-3.3 happy (note the 32 instead of o32).
> > >
> > > Yes, IIRC 64 vs. n64 has the same problem.
> >
> > That's not quite the same: 64 is o64, n64 is n64.
>
> I don't think so (There's -mabi=o64).
> Otherwise I would have built all my NewABI 64bit Executables as
> o64 without noticing ever. :-)
You are, of course, right :)
> > GCC's never called the 32-bit ABI "o32".
>
> True, but it might be clearer if it did.
I suppose... too late now.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-15 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-18 15:41 -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18 Guido Guenther
2003-03-18 16:03 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-03-18 17:42 ` Guido Guenther
2003-03-18 19:08 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-03-18 23:24 ` Guido Guenther
2003-03-19 0:16 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-03-19 1:25 ` Guido Guenther
2003-05-13 11:33 ` Guido Guenther
2003-05-13 19:27 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-13 19:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-13 19:59 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-15 3:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-05-13 20:11 ` Guido Guenther
2003-05-13 20:50 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-13 22:22 ` Guido Guenther
2003-05-14 10:53 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-05-14 15:12 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-14 17:03 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-05-14 17:50 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-14 18:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-05-14 18:42 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-15 11:39 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-05-15 11:50 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-15 12:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-03-26 16:05 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030515035507.GA4654@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=agx@sigxcpu.org \
--cc=ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.