From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "P.Italiaander" <pc-secure@home.nl>
Subject: Re: NOT acceptable "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup" script !!!
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 17:42:26 +0200
Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <200305151742.26913.pc-secure@home.nl>
References: <200305142155.31623.pc-secure@home.nl> <200305150215.56631.pc-secure@home.nl> <20030515145236.7044bbf1.arnt@c2i.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030515145236.7044bbf1.arnt@c2i.net>
Content-Disposition: inline
Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

Op donderdag 15 mei 2003 14:52, schreef Arnt Karlsen:

> ..I know, ipup _is_ buggy, my hint was more on Red Hats somewhat
> sloppy QA attitude.  I mean, if I should _not_ use RH9 to route
> traffic, I would like to know _that_ from the docs.
>
> ..does Mandrake or Debian turn their rear end onto _whoever_ like RH-9
> does in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171 ???


I've checked , but Mandrake 9.1 is not effected with that bug.
Thanks for mention it. 
On Debian i don't know  ,don't have it , i use OpenBSD en Linux SuSe , Redhat 
,Mandrake.

Does anyone have tested yet,  my patched /sbin/ifup file, for iptables-script 
??

Pascal