From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>,
James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] switch scsi upper driver probing to the driver model
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 12:02:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030519190227.GA25948@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030517091352.A13403@lst.de>
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 09:13:52AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 01:59:52PM +1000, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> > It was my understanding that the device model has been
> > recently modified by Greg KH to cope with the dual nature
> > of the interface that sg causes. Evidently similar situations
> > occur elsewhere in the kernel.
>
> Greg, any comments on this? I haven't found any code like that
> in drivers/base/ and I can't understand how this is supposed to work..`
I don't really know what you all are talking about here, but...
In talking with Mike Anderson about the driver class code changes, he
and I agreed that sg could just be made a struct class_device. It could
go under a "scsi" class if you want, and would point to the scsi devices
(in the device tree) that the sg driver is bound to.
Does that make more sense?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-19 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-16 16:20 [PATCH] switch scsi upper driver probing to the driver model Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-16 23:57 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-17 2:25 ` Willem Riede
2003-05-17 7:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-17 9:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-17 16:35 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-17 9:59 ` Kai Makisara
2003-05-17 15:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-17 16:19 ` James Bottomley
2003-05-18 9:35 ` Kai Makisara
2003-05-17 3:59 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-05-17 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-19 19:02 ` Greg KH [this message]
2003-05-17 8:32 ` Jens Axboe
2003-05-17 12:52 ` Willem Riede
2003-05-19 21:38 ` Patrick Mansfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030519190227.GA25948@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.