From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.74]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F3E4829 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:15:15 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 19:16:20 -0400 From: Carlos O'Donell To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4 and semtimedop - need kernel compat? Message-ID: <20030519231620.GA1489@systemhalted> References: <20030519201224.GB542@systemhalted> <20030519220631.GA31518@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20030519220631.GA31518@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > Uh, you don't need to do anything. If you call an unassigned syscall, > you get -ENOSYS. The idea was that it might be able to provide the required compat functionality in 2.4. If we feel it's not possible then we can eliminate all the entries in sys_parisc.c/sys32_parisc.c and leave the syscall as ENTRY_SAME(nisyscall) in entry.S. The glibc side of the code is done. c.